MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Paula Badosa Gibert [9th] vs Suzan Lamens [69th] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-To-Head: Gibert 0 - 0 Lamens

Gibert vs Lamens H2H Profile
Gibert Stats Lamens
63% (12-7) YTD Win/Loss 60% (15-10)
0 Head-to-Head 0
9 Ranking 69
2 Highest Rank 64
27 Age 25
R Plays -
11 Titles 8
65% (385-211) Career Total W/L 58% (300-217)
$7,788,293 Career Prize Money $426,753

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Gibert VS Lamens H2H Matches played

No H2H Matches Available

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Paula Badosa Gibert vs Suzan Lamens Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Gibert 0 - 0 Lamens

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibert has won 42.02% of points on their second serve, while Lamens has won 39.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibert, in recent form, has won 49.46% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lamens has won 50.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.39% and 31.15% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Gibert has saved 51.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamens has saved 46.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Gibert has won 70.49% of matches played (W/L 43/ 18), with Lamens winning 56.06% (W/L 37/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 167/ 89), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 26/ 19). Lamens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 187/ 120), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
  • Player level: In the last year, Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 70.83% of matches (W/L 17/ 7), where as Lamens has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 61.76% of matches (W/L 21/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibert has played against opponents with an average rank of 47.9 while Lamens has played against players with an average rank of 136.15.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibert has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamens has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibert has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamens has converted 36.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R4
    L
    w/o H2H
    R3
    cross
    Paula Badosa Gibert
    Player
    Clara Tauson
    65% ( 52 of 80)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 40 of 63)
    7
    Aces
    5
    5
    Double Faults
    1
    83% ( 43 of 52)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 29 of 40)
    46% ( 13 of 28)
    2nd Serve Won
    57% ( 13 of 23)
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 7)
    30% ( 24 of 80)
    Rtn Points Won
    33% ( 21 of 63)
    77
    Total Points Won
    66
    W
    6-3 7-6(3) H2H
    R2
    cross
    Paula Badosa Gibert
    Player
    Victoria Mboko
    61% ( 58 of 95)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 73 of 112)
    5
    Aces
    4
    7
    Double Faults
    8
    72% ( 42 of 58)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 48 of 73)
    43% ( 16 of 37)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 17 of 39)
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    39% ( 37 of 95)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 47 of 112)
    105
    Total Points Won
    102
    W
    7-5 1-6 7-6(3) H2H
    QF
    cross
    Daria Saville
    Player
    Paula Badosa Gibert
    64% ( 25 of 39)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 31 of 47)
    0
    Aces
    2
    5
    Double Faults
    4
    44% ( 11 of 25)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 21 of 31)
    43% ( 6 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 6 of 16)
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    56% ( 22 of 39)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 20 of 47)
    37
    Total Points Won
    49
    L
    1-6 5-3 ret. H2H
    R2
    cross
    Paula Badosa Gibert
    Player
    Jaqueline Cristian
    72% ( 31 of 43)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 25 of 43)
    8
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    87% ( 27 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    44% ( 11 of 25)
    50% ( 6 of 12)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 8 of 18)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    23% ( 10 of 43)
    Rtn Points Won
    56% ( 24 of 43)
    57
    Total Points Won
    29
    W
    6-2 6-1 H2H
    R3
    cross
    Elena Rybakina
    Player
    Paula Badosa Gibert
    64% ( 87 of 137)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 69 of 118)
    10
    Aces
    8
    8
    Double Faults
    8
    68% ( 59 of 87)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 47 of 69)
    44% ( 22 of 50)
    2nd Serve Won
    47% ( 23 of 49)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 5 of 17)
    41% ( 56 of 137)
    Rtn Points Won
    41% ( 48 of 118)
    129
    Total Points Won
    126
    L
    4-6 7-6(8) 7-6(2) H2H
    R2
    cross
    Paula Badosa Gibert
    Player
    Elise Mertens
    63% ( 30 of 48)
    1st Serve %
    53% ( 20 of 38)
    4
    Aces
    2
    2
    Double Faults
    4
    87% ( 26 of 30)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 13 of 20)
    56% ( 10 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    17% ( 3 of 18)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    25% ( 12 of 48)
    Rtn Points Won
    58% ( 22 of 38)
    58
    Total Points Won
    28
    W
    6-2 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Paula Badosa Gibert
    Player
    Lulu Sun
    56% ( 31 of 55)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 34 of 66)
    5
    Aces
    2
    6
    Double Faults
    2
    87% ( 27 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 23 of 34)
    54% ( 13 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 13 of 32)
    21% ( 3 of 14)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    27% ( 15 of 55)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 30 of 66)
    70
    Total Points Won
    51
    W
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Amanda Anisimova
    Player
    Paula Badosa Gibert
    55% ( 37 of 67)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 50 of 79)
    2
    Aces
    2
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    68% ( 25 of 37)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 30 of 50)
    60% ( 18 of 30)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 12 of 29)
    31% ( 4 of 13)
    Break Points Won
    20% ( 2 of 10)
    36% ( 24 of 67)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 37 of 79)
    80
    Total Points Won
    66
    L
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Paula Badosa Gibert
    Player
    Renata Zarazua
    60% ( 47 of 78)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 52 of 76)
    14
    Aces
    0
    6
    Double Faults
    4
    74% ( 35 of 47)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 32 of 52)
    42% ( 13 of 31)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 9 of 24)
    67% ( 6 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    38% ( 30 of 78)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 35 of 76)
    83
    Total Points Won
    71
    W
    6-3 4-6 6-2 H2H

    Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    SF
    cross
    Olga Danilovic
    Player
    Suzan Lamens
    72% ( 44 of 61)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 40 of 61)
    3
    Aces
    2
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    66% ( 29 of 44)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 29 of 40)
    59% ( 10 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 6 of 21)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    36% ( 22 of 61)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 26 of 61)
    65
    Total Points Won
    57
    L
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Suzan Lamens
    Player
    Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
    66% ( 33 of 50)
    1st Serve %
    69% ( 35 of 51)
    1
    Aces
    1
    3
    Double Faults
    5
    55% ( 18 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    37% ( 13 of 35)
    47% ( 8 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 6 of 16)
    64% ( 7 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    48% ( 24 of 50)
    Rtn Points Won
    63% ( 32 of 51)
    58
    Total Points Won
    43
    W
    6-3 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Suzan Lamens
    Player
    Linda Noskova
    61% ( 33 of 54)
    1st Serve %
    71% ( 44 of 62)
    5
    Aces
    4
    5
    Double Faults
    2
    82% ( 27 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 25 of 44)
    43% ( 9 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    28% ( 5 of 18)
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    20% ( 1 of 5)
    33% ( 18 of 54)
    Rtn Points Won
    52% ( 32 of 62)
    68
    Total Points Won
    48
    W
    6-4 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Suzan Lamens
    Player
    Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
    59% ( 55 of 94)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 73 of 109)
    2
    Aces
    6
    6
    Double Faults
    1
    71% ( 39 of 55)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 44 of 73)
    56% ( 22 of 39)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 18 of 36)
    36% ( 4 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    35% ( 33 of 94)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 47 of 109)
    108
    Total Points Won
    95
    W
    6-1 4-6 7-6(2) H2H
    Rubber 2
    cross
    Suzan Lamens
    Player
    Katie Boulter
    106% ( 69 of 65)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 41 of 65)
    0
    Aces
    4
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    69% ( 24 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 26 of 41)
    59% ( 10 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 9 of 24)
    56% ( 5 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    67% ( 2 of 3)
    35% ( 18 of 52)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 30 of 65)
    64
    Total Points Won
    53
    W
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    Rubber 2
    cross
    Suzan Lamens
    Player
    Tatjana Maria
    117% ( 70 of 60)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 58 of 88)
    1
    Aces
    5
    7
    Double Faults
    2
    70% ( 40 of 57)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 41 of 58)
    45% ( 18 of 40)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 13 of 30)
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    40% ( 39 of 97)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 34 of 88)
    92
    Total Points Won
    93
    W
    3-6 6-3 7-5 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Moyuka Uchijima
    Player
    Suzan Lamens
    59% ( 51 of 87)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 52 of 79)
    7
    Aces
    1
    5
    Double Faults
    6
    65% ( 33 of 51)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 34 of 52)
    53% ( 19 of 36)
    2nd Serve Won
    33% ( 9 of 27)
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    13% ( 1 of 8)
    40% ( 35 of 87)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 36 of 79)
    88
    Total Points Won
    78
    L
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Elena Rybakina
    Player
    Suzan Lamens
    64% ( 43 of 67)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 36 of 65)
    5
    Aces
    4
    3
    Double Faults
    6
    77% ( 33 of 43)
    1st Serve Won
    61% ( 22 of 36)
    42% ( 10 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 12 of 29)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    36% ( 24 of 67)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 31 of 65)
    74
    Total Points Won
    58
    L
    6-3 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Suzan Lamens
    Player
    Marie Bouzkova
    64% ( 51 of 80)
    1st Serve %
    54% ( 51 of 95)
    2
    Aces
    1
    7
    Double Faults
    10
    67% ( 34 of 51)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 36 of 51)
    48% ( 14 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    36% ( 16 of 44)
    56% ( 5 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    40% ( 32 of 80)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 43 of 95)
    91
    Total Points Won
    84
    W
    3-6 6-3 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Greetje Minnen
    Player
    Suzan Lamens
    53% ( 24 of 45)
    1st Serve %
    69% ( 27 of 39)
    2
    Aces
    1
    4
    Double Faults
    3
    67% ( 16 of 24)
    1st Serve Won
    37% ( 10 of 27)
    62% ( 13 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    17% ( 2 of 12)
    60% ( 6 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    36% ( 16 of 45)
    Rtn Points Won
    69% ( 27 of 39)
    56
    Total Points Won
    28
    L
    6-1 6-0 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Gibert & Lamens Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Paula Badosa Gibert Gibert Stats Suzan Lamens Lamens
    65% (385/211) Win/Loss 58% (300/217)
    62% (838/520) Sets Win/Loss 56% (664/519)
    55% (6800/5649) Games Win/Loss 53% (5707/5059)
    0.28 Aces Per Game 0.16
    1696 Aces Total 843
    0.35 Double Faults Per Game 0.47
    2115 Total Double Faults 2440
    1:18:39 Average Match Time 1:29:12
    377.58 Average Opponent Rank 429.03
    60% (20345/33793) 1st Serve % 59% (18217/30941)
    67% (13599/20345) 1st Serve Win % 62% (11247/18170)
    46% (6207/13434) 2nd Serve Win % 43% (5458/12796)
    46% (1955/4236) Break Points Won % (Total) 51% (2097/4127)
    45% (15343/34072) Return Points Win % 48% (14931/31092)
    67% (381/568) Best of 3 Sets Win % 58% (297/513)
    10% (1/10) Best of 5 Sets Win % 100% (1/1)
    61% (85/139) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 50% (48/96)
    64% (113/176) Deciding Set Win % 56% (85/151)
    88% (374/329) 1st Set Won, Won Match 91% (274/248)
    11% (374/42) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 9% (274/26)
    25% (222/55) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 21% (243/52)

    Potential H2H Matches This Week For Paula Badosa Gibert

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    Gibert vs Kostyuk H2H, could play in The Third round

    Gibert vs Raducanu H2H, could play in The Third round

    Gibert vs Lamens H2H, could play in The Third round

    Gibert vs Kudermetova H2H, could play in The Second round

    Gibert vs Kudermetova H2H, could play in The Second round

    View full predicted draw for Gibert in Madrid

    Potential H2H Matches This Week For Suzan Lamens

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    Kudermetova vs Lamens H2H, could play in The Third round

    Kudermetova vs Lamens H2H, could play in The Third round

    Gibert vs Lamens H2H, could play in The Third round

    Lamens vs Kostyuk H2H, could play in The Second round

    View full predicted draw for Lamens in Madrid

    Other Predictions

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    17:00
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    17:00
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    18:30
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Porsche Tennis Grand Prix - Stuttgart

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    14:00
    Prediction
    • Loading news...